My Votes in the Blue Jar Group Writing Project

September 19, 2007 by Lillie 

The “How-To” Group Writing Project generated 44 qualified entries. Now the bloggers who participated will determine the winners. Entrants have a week to post a list of their choices for the top 3 entries. Sarah at BlueJar.com will review the list, tally the results, and announce the winners.

Narrowing down my favorites to three proved to be a challenge. It was fairly easy to dismiss some of the entries.

  1. First, I eliminated posts that told how to do something I personally found morally objectionable or questionable.
  2. Then, I marked off the posts that contained numerous grammar errors or that were confusing and difficult to understand. That might be unfair, as the advice may have been useful. However, as an editor, I was too distracted by the errors and trying to understand the blogger’s point to recognize the value of the advice.
  3. Next, I removed from consideration posts that seemed light on useful information, because, in my opinion, they either skimmed the surface of the topic or repeated conventional wisdom without giving me new information or a new perspective.

Obviously, all of this is completely subjective. Information that seemed light to me may be exactly what someone else needed to hear. Advice that I find morally questionable may be perfectly acceptable to another person. Poor writing and errors may not bother someone else if the information is useful. But we each have to come up with some way to reduce 44 qualified entries to 3 top picks, and that’s how I chose to begin the process.

After I culled the list using the above criteria, I reviewed the remaining entries (more than half of the original list) and evaluated how well the post explained how to … whatever, how easy the instructions were to understand, how enjoyable the post was to read, and how much useful information it provided. That led to a list of nine entries that I found especially useful and interesting. I re-read and re-evaluated those posts to come up with my final list. Sarah said we could list runners-up, but only the top three will count in the final vote tally. My top three and runners-up appear below, each list in the same order as the final list of entries.

Top Three:

Honorable Mention:

Thanks Sarah, for sponsoring the contest, and thanks to all the entrants for participating.

Do you agree with my choices? Share your favorite entries in comments.

[tags]group writing project, How-To Group Writing Project, how-to[/tags]

Comments

RSS feed | Trackback URI

12 Comments »

Comment by Web Design Business
2007-09-19 06:11:03

Thanks for the link and comments on the article. I am still going through my reviewing process which is strikingly similar and subjective like yours. Glad to know I am not the only one.

- James (FocusMinded)

 
Comment by John
2007-09-19 06:13:51

Thanks for the mention, I’ll just quickly go check my grammar! ;-)

My you’ve listed two of the top three I’ve selected so by and large I agree with your choices. The difference is largely because I biased my choices towards posts that would interest my readers.

 
Comment by Lillie
2007-09-19 07:13:13

James,
I think the process has to be subjective. As a writer/editor, I know everything is publishing is subjective. One agent or editor falls in love with a manuscript, and the next one hates it. One reviewer writes glowing accolades of a book, and another rips it apart.

John,
Someone will probably point out a terrible glaring grammar error in this post. :-) I’ve seen errors slip through several rounds of editing and proofreading and not show up until the book is in print. The posts I eliminated for grammar errors had numerous errors – all of us make mistakes from time to time. It becomes a problem when the poor grammar interferes with understanding. And choosing your top picks on the basis of what would be of value to your readers is a good tactic.

 
Comment by Writing Nag
2007-09-19 08:31:01

Thanks for the mention Lillie!

 
Comment by Sheila
2007-09-19 09:09:53

Wow! You are super efficient to have reviewed and selected your top choices so quickly! I like your methodology.

Many thanks for the mention. I’m honored. :-)

 
Comment by Steven Snell
2007-09-19 18:08:59

Thanks for the link and the vote! I’ll be posting my choices probably tomorrow.

 
Comment by Lillie
2007-09-19 18:42:58

Writing Nag,
I liked your article – it was definitely worth a mention.

Sheila,
Writing a post was the next item on my agenda when I finished reading my feeds, so I did this instead of what I had intended to write, which can wait for later. I liked your entry even though I can’t travel for health reasons – it was informative and interesting.

Steven,
Your post offered good advice I could have used recently.

 
2007-09-20 01:10:56

most useful for me was the beinneers guide to seo, good stuff!

 
Comment by GnomeyNewt
2007-09-20 01:45:38

Thanks for your votes and for your ideas on how to pick your top choices. DBT has 121 entries, so that will be fun won’t it be to pick out our top choices!

 
Comment by Lillie
2007-09-20 01:51:27

subconscious mind,
Glad to hear that your favorite was among my favorites as well.
GnomeyNewt,
Thanks for sponsoring the contest. It took me quite a while to review the entries and choose my favorites – it will take me longer to review 121 entries in DBT!

 
Comment by MDB
2007-09-27 08:15:48

Thanks for the vote. Hope you try to put at least a few of the things into practice. Am off to have a good snoop around your site now :D

 
Comment by Lillie
2007-09-27 09:01:57

MDB,
Since this is a hobby, I’ve spent my time doing the fun stuff – writing posts and interacting with readers and other bloggers – and neglected all the boring stuff, like SEO. :-)

 

Responses to this post:

Please read the instructions below. For more information see my comment policy.

Please include your first name or nickname. This site uses KeywordLuv. See instructions below name field. If this is your first comment, it will be held for moderation. After your first comment is approved, future comments will not be moderated. If your comment doesn't appear within a day, e-mail Lillie—the comment may have been caught in spam.
Name (required)
This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter Your Name @ Your Keywords (Fill in the keywords you want to appear in your link) in the Name field to take advantage. The link will appear in the post though not in the preview; if you see a mistake after the comment is posted, you have 15 minutes to edit your comment.
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If you have not previously left a comment that has been approved, your comment will not appear until I have approved the first one.

CommentLuv Enabled

This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.