About Critique Groups

September 17, 2006 by Lillie 

Who reads your work-in-progress?

I recently read some advice – rules of life – from a famous writer. Sorry, I forgot who it was!

This great writer said he never let anyone read his works-in-progress, and he advised other writers to follow his example. He said most people don’t know enough about writing to recognize whether your work is any good, and you’re apt to get one of two reactions: 1) the reader will criticize your writing and damage your confidence or 2) the reader will believe the writing is superior just because you, someone that person loves, wrote it.

While this advice has merit, I think writers can benefit from having someone else read our work to give us perspective. We can’t judge our own work objectively. However, it makes sense to be selective in who you let see your masterpiece-in-the-making. Sometimes people will find fault with what you write because they’re jealous of you; sometimes they’ll criticize because they think it makes them look smart. And your loved ones are probably too biased to give you a fair reading.

So who should you trust to read your work-in-progress? When I first started writing, I got excellent advice from other writers who were self-confident enough to be objective. My friend Grace Anne Schaefer read my novel Stroke of Luck when I was about halfway through the first draft. She said some words of encouragement, then suggested I add some dialogue. I’d written half a novel and no one had ever spoken! She pointed out a few more – less serious – problems, and I put her advice into practice right away.

Contrary to my advice that family members aren’t necessarily good choices to read your manuscript, my mother read my story when I finished the first draft. She said, “I don’t know what it was, but the second half of the book was a lot better than the first.” Grace Anne’s guidance had made that much difference.

A little later in my writing career, three other writers and I formed a critique group. The two years or so that the group met was the most productive time in my fiction-writing experience. We met once a week; each of us brought three copies of a chapter in our current work-in-progress. We read the chapters during the week, and the next week we discussed and critiqued each other’s work. We each told what we liked, what problems we saw, and what suggestions we had.

Our philosophy was that if one person mentioned a problem, the writer should consider it and decide whether or not she wanted to revise. If two others mentioned the same problem, the writer should seriously consider making a change. And if all three of the others saw the same problem, the writer definitely needed to make revisions.

This group worked because of the mix of members. Each of us had specific strengths - imagination, mechanics (grammar, etc.), historical knowledge and life experience, attention to details…. Although we all wrote romantic fiction, we wrote in several subgenres. We were all about the same level of writing experience, so we learned and grew together. Groups that aren’t fairly well matched in experience usually find that the more experienced members are mentoring those with less experience – a commendable thing to do, but not the purpose of a critique group designed to benefit all the members. Most importantly, we liked and trusted each other; we were supportive, encouraging, and rooting for each other’s success.

Participating in the critique group proved to be a positive experience for me. I enjoyed the camaraderie with other writers who became good friends. I learned so much about writing - evaluating someone else’s work can teach a lot to improve your own writing. I finished a novel in record time because I didn’t want to be the only one who didn’t bring a chapter to the weekly meeting. And it was after becoming part of the critique group that my novel was published.

I’ve heard horror stories about bad critique groups, and I’ll make suggestions on how to avoid a bad experience. But I was blessed to be part of a wonderful group.

Related Posts:
The Value of Writers Groups
Beware of the Wrong Critique Groups

[tags]writing, critique groups[/tags]

Comments

3 Responses to “About Critique Groups”

  1. [...] In an earlier post, I talked about the value of critique groups. I failed to mention one important benefit: brainstorming. In a critique group, you can tell your fellow writers if you’re stuck on something or if you’re trying to decide between two storylines, scenes, or options. The whole group pitches in with suggestions, reactions, new ideas. Many of the ideas will be useless, but some will be helpful, others may not work but may lead to better ideas, and a few may be brilliant. As the writer, you listen to the ideas, use the ones that work, and build on the ideas that lead you in a different direction. [...]

  2. [...] an expert in the subject is best to ensure that your information is accurate. You can join a critique group to get feedback from other writers. A professional editor can help you with grammar as well as with [...]

  3. [...] can join a writers group or form your own critique group of other writers who will give you feedback on your work. If you choose the right critique [...]

Leave a Reply

Please read the instructions below. For more information see my comment policy.

Please include your first name or nickname. This site uses KeywordLuv. See instructions below name field. If this is your first comment, it will be held for moderation. After your first comment is approved, future comments will not be moderated. If your comment doesn't appear within a day, e-mail Lillie—the comment may have been caught in spam.

This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter Your Name @ Your Keywords (Fill in the keywords you want to appear in your link) in the Name field to take advantage. The link will appear in the post though not in the preview; if you see a mistake after the comment is posted, you have 15 minutes to edit your comment.

CommentLuv badge

This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

If you have not previously left a comment that has been approved, your comment will not appear until I have approved the first one.